Presentation: The Unique Fiscal Constraints of Colorado
August 11, 2009
|
|
Presentation: Maximizing Federal Stimulus and Eliminating the 6%
February 03, 2009
|
|
Budget Works 2009: Economic Stimulus Benefits from Public Investment
January 16, 2009
Chart showing economic stimulus benefits from different types of public investments, courtesy of Moody\'s economist, Mark Zandi.
|
|
Budget Works 2009: Colorado\'s Unique Constraints
January 16, 2009
A look at Colorado\'s unique constitutional and statutory constraints.
|
|
Budget Works 2009: Revenue 101
January 16, 2009
A presentation on Colorado\'s revenue system.
|
|
Budget Works 2009: Legislative Council Presentation
January 16, 2009
A presentation from Legislative Council economist, Natalie Mullis.
|
|
Report Update: Looking Forward
April 22, 2008
The Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, the Bell Policy Center, and the Colorado Children\'s Campaign released a new in December 2007, called Looking Forward, that looks ahead at Colorado\'s fiscal prospects after Referendum C. The collaborative project, headed up by eight researchers from these three nonprofits, forecasts a six-year budget window with the goal of providing Coloradoans with good information so they can make sound decisions about tax and fiscal policy. This is an updated presentation about the Looking Forward report.
|
|
Colorado\'s Fiscal Future Post Referendum C: An Analysis
January 05, 2007
This PowerPoint presentation from our annual Budget Works Seminar analyzes Colorado\'s budget in the post Referendum C era. It models different economic possibilities and outlines steps that policymakers can take today to ensure a healthy future tomorrow.
|
|
Medicaid - What\'s Next
June 25, 2005
A powerpoint presentation that walks through the basics of Medicaid, what it means to ensuring health care for those who need it, financing challenges and what reform might look like.
|
|
Baking the Biggest Pie - Using Referendum C Money the Way Voters Wanted
June 01, 2000
Explains the limits on Ref C money and how those limits will direct the flow of the money on programs and as a result possibly thwart the intent of the voters.
|
|
