HUMAN SERVICES GAP MAP
Improving access and fiscal performance of state programs to ensure a healthy foundation for all Coloradans
- Food Security: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
- Food Security: Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC)
- Early Learning: Colorado Child Care Assistance Program (CCCAP)
- Financial Security: Colorado Works
- Health: Health First Colorado (Medicaid)
HUMAN SERVICES GAP NO. 1:
PROGRAM ACCESS
The interactive graph below shows the gap between the number of Coloradans enrolled and the number estimated to be eligible for enrollment by county for food assistance (SNAP), nutrition assistance for women, infants and children (WIC), child care assistance (CCCAP), Colorado Works and Medicaid.
For many reasons, gaps in program access exist in all five programs across all counties. Some counties have a much larger gap between the people eligible for basic needs programs and those who actually receive assistance than other counties. The size of a gap may point to a missed opportunity to meet residents’ needs or more efficiently use available resources.
For child care assistance (CCCAP) and Colorado Works, the access gap is also a function of funding caps. This is a powerful visual example of how block-granted programs fall short in providing necessary services to help Americans build strong foundations: even if counties spend 100% of their program allocation, they seldom help even half of all eligible families in their communities.
County:
Caseload and Estimated Eligibility, 2014-16
:
, 2014-16
(Counties with an estimate of the population eligible for WIC have red bars)
HUMAN SERVICES GAP NO. 2:
PROGRAM ALLOCATIONS VS. ACTUAL SPENDING
The State of Colorado appropriates money for public benefit programs that is divided among the counties. Allocations are based on a formula that considers historical caseloads, poverty rates and population. Counties generally have a high degree of discretion in how funds are spent within state and federal laws applicable to each program. This interactive graph shows the gap between the program allocations for CCCAP and Colorado Works versus the actual spending by county.
Big 10 Counties:
Percent of County Allocation Over or Under-Spent, SFY
County:
Allocation Expenditures and County Reserves, SFY 14-16
Some counties overspend their allocation while other counties underspend.Overspending may enable a county to more fully meet the community needs for assistance and may signal that the county needs additional state funds to support its residents.
Counties that underspend their allocation might leave money on the table that could help address the needs of their residents and stimulate the economy. Through a relatively complicated process, the state takes back unspent money from counties that did not spend their full allocation and redistributes it to the counties that are overspent.
From year to year, there is always some level of over- and underspending for many reasons. Caseloads fluctuate as community needs change making it difficult for county human services agencies to balance expenditures. Some communities face a shortage of child care providers and organizations to provide job placement, education, internships, and case management which has implications for counties fully expending their allocation. The data provided here is intended to be a resource for having these conversations about how to best manage county allocations and expenditures for these critical human services programs.
HUMAN SERVICES GAP NO. 3:
COST PER CASE &
BENEFITS
PROVIDED PER ADMINISTRATIVE DOLLAR SPENT
Eligibility, allocation and spending may provide clues about how counties can align their enrollment efforts or better manage their human services resources. But variability in administrative costs per case and benefits provided per administrative dollar spent might say more about a county’s efficiency than overall expenditures. The interactive graph below provides two measures of administrative and fiscal efficiency.
Cost per case is the amount of administrative dollars spent per case to enroll a client, and for some programs, to manage the administrative aspects of the case. A lower cost per case is an indicator of more efficient systems for enrolling and processing client cases. Larger counties may benefit from economies of scale on this measure.
Benefits provided per administrative dollar spent (abbreviated as ROI below) is a measure of how much in program benefits (i.e., cash, cash equivalent and/or services) are distributed per administrative dollar spent. This measure can be influenced by many factors, including efficiency of enrollment procedures, staffing costs driven by cost of living in a community, and the type of services provided. For example, administrative costs for the WIC program include nutrition education by registered dieticians, increasing the cost of the services provided especially compared to the cash benefits provided to participants.
Big 10 Counties:
,
County
,
MAPPING THE GAPS IN MEDICAID AND SNAP ENROLLMENT
To support thriving communities and individuals, we need to promote and align key human-service programs to support the health and well-being of all Coloradans. The interactive map below shows enrollment rates for Colorado’s two largest human services programs: Medicaid focused on access to health care and SNAP focused on access to food security. We provide an in-depth window into participation in these two vital programs for a few key reasons.
We know that food security reduces health care costs, improves health and education outcomes for children and stabilizes our state’s workforce. And yet, Colorado ranks 44th in the nation for SNAP enrollment. At the same time, enrollment in Medicaid has grown substantially across the state.
The data in this map provides a detailed picture of where enrollment in one program may be strong but is lagging in the other. Communities can use this information to begin asking questions about why enrollment is lagging, identify barriers to enrollment, and develop strategies and partnerships to improve access to food security and health care.
See the Food Assistance (SNAP) Benefit Calculator to get an estimate of your eligibility for food benefits.
then Search by Zip or Tract:
GAP MAP SOLUTIONS
With broad support from a diverse array of stakeholders, Senate Bill 190 was passed in 2016, which aimed to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the state-supervised, county-administered food assistance program (SNAP).
The legislation clarified the expectations for administration of the program at the state and county levels, and created incentives for meeting and exceeding the federal standards for the timely and accurate processing of SNAP applications.
It also authorized a study of how Colorado’s 64 counties can implement best practices to increase their efficiency and effectiveness in delivering a number of public assistance programs and the support they will need from the state to do so.
The bill was passed unanimously by Colorado legislators and was signed into law by Gov. John Hickenlooper on June 1, 2016.
For more information on strategies being developed to end hunger for all Coloradans, see the Blueprint to End Hunger. It’s a multi-year plan developed by stakeholders across the state and includes efforts to maximize enrollment of income-eligible Coloradans in both WIC and SNAP.
See the Food Assistance (SNAP) Benefit Calculator to get an estimate of your eligibility for food benefits.
With enrollments in decline since 2009, nutrition assistance for women, infants and children (WIC) is focusing on identifying the potentially eligible population by census tract and county. This will enable prioritization of geographic areas with high levels of potentially eligible participants in order to strengthen outreach and referrals in specific areas.
Colorado WIC has partnered with the U.S. Census Bureau to receive detailed information on people who are eligible for WIC but not yet enrolled by census tract. This data, while valuable, will be somewhat outdated.
To rectify the situation, Colorado WIC is partnering with Medicaid to get monthly counts of enrolled pregnant women and children who are 0-5 years old to compare with counts of WIC clients as a real-time proxy measure for participation.
For more information on strategies being developed to end hunger for all Coloradans, see the Blueprint to End Hunger. It’s a multi-year plan developed by stakeholders across the state and includes efforts to maximize enrollment of income-eligible Coloradans in both WIC and SNAP.
CCCAP helps families build a foundation of self-sufficiency by providing child care assistance to families who are working, searching for employment or participating in training. But not everyone who could benefit from the program has been able to use it.
Unfortunately, some families with the highest need for child care assistance have been effectively barred from CCCAP because of a policy that requires recipients to identify both parents in order to qualify. For example, a teen mother might be unable to continue her education because she is unwilling to identify the father of her child. This refusal may be an effort to protect him or to protect their relationship. On the other hand, she or her family may want to protect the baby and the young mom by avoiding the creation or continuance of an unhealthy relationship. According to the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, one of the leading barriers that prevent teen mothers from graduating from high school is access to child care.
Fortunately, House Bill 1227 lifted the requirement for teenagers and victims of domestic violence to disclose the identity of the other parent when applying for child care assistance. The legislation was passed by the Colorado House and Senate during the 2016 legislative session was signed by Gov. John Hickenlooper. The legislation went into effect in the 2016-17 fiscal year.
Single parents who receive Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Basic Cash Assistance (also known as Colorado Works) will no longer have to choose between receiving payments from the program and child support thanks to a law approved by legislators and the governor in 2015.
Previously, child support payments were “retained” by the state and used to help reimburse the federal, state and county governments for the cost of human services, including child support enforcement and services.
Developed by the Colorado Center on Law and Policy, Senate Bill 12 allows TANF recipients to receive child support payments without reducing their benefits from the program. Furthermore, non-custodial parents are more likely to comply with child support orders when they know that their child support payments directly increase the financial support available to their children.
The law went into effect in April 2017.
Medicaid recipients and administrators often face the challenge of “churn” – a word that describes the movement between health coverage programs due to fluctuations of income and household size. Unfortunately, churn often results in temporary loss of coverage when recipients’ statuses change, but it also has negative effects on health outcomes and increases administrative costs associated with enrolling and re-enrolling individuals into coverage programs.
To reduce churn and encourage better continuity of care, the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, with the support of advocates, adopted a federal option that would allow recipients who are at risk of losing Medicaid due to seasonal, commission-based or self-employment income to annualize that income over the rest of the year.
For example, if a person is found ineligible for Medicaid based on monthly income due to seasonal work at a ski resort, projected income can be spread out over the remainder of the year and prevent the person from losing coverage. This saves the system administrative costs and prevents a lapse of coverage that could potentially affect the individual’s health.
The new rule went into effect in Colorado on June 31, 2016.